Cultural validation of the structured clinical interview for diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders in Indigenous Australians

Author:

Toombs Maree1,Nasir Bushra2,Kisely Steve3ORCID,Ranmuthugala Geetha4,Gill Neeraj S5ORCID,Beccaria Gavin6,Hayman Noel7,Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan Srinivas N8,Nicholson Geoffrey C9

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

2. Research Fellow, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

3. Professor of Psychiatry, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

4. Head of School, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, and; School of Rural Medicine, The University of New England, Armidale, NSW, Australia

5. Clinical-Academic Lead Mental Health, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, and; School of Medicine, Griffith University, Southport, QLD, Australia

6. Associate Professor, School of Psychology and Counselling, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

7. Associate Professor, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

8. Director Research, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

9. Professor, Rural Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Objective: This study determined the cultural appropriateness of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I) as an acceptable tool for diagnosing mental illness among Indigenous people. Methods: De-identified qualitative feedback from participants and psychologists regarding the cultural appropriateness of the SCID-I for Indigenous people using open-ended anonymous questionnaires was gathered. Aboriginal Medial Service staff and Indigenous Support Workers participated in a focus group. Results: A total of 95.6% of participants felt comfortable during the 498 questionnaires completed. Psychologists also provided qualitative feedback for 502 (92.3%) interviews, of whom 40.4% established a good rapport with participants. Of the participants, 77.7% understood the SCID-I questions well, while 72.5% did not require any cultural allowances to reach a clinical diagnosis. Conclusion: When administered by a culturally safe trained psychologist, SCID-I is well tolerated in this group.

Funder

national health and medical research council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3