The use of restraint in four general hospital emergency departments in Australia

Author:

Gerace Adam1,Pamungkas Dewi R2,Oster Candice3,Thomson Del4,Muir-Cochrane Eimear5

Affiliation:

1. Postdoctoral Research Fellow, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

2. Master of Nursing by Research Student, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

3. Research Associate, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

4. Clinical Risk Manager, Quality and Risk, Office of the Chief Psychiatrist and Mental Health Policy, Division of Mental Health & Substance Abuse, SA Department for Health and Ageing, Adelaide, SA, Australia

5. Professor and Chair of Mental Health Nursing, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate restraint use in Australian emergency departments (EDs). Method: A retrospective audit of restraint incidents in four EDs (from 1 January 2010 to 31 December 2011). Results: The restraint rate was 0.04% of total ED presentations. Males and females were involved in similar numbers of incidents. Over 90% of restrained patients had a mental illness diagnosis and were compulsorily hospitalised. Mechanical restraint with the use of soft shackles was the main method used. Restraint was enacted to prevent harm to self and/or others. Median incident duration was 2 hours 5 minutes. Conclusions: In order to better integrate the needs of mental health clients, consideration is needed as to what improvements to procedures and the ED environment can be made. EDs should particularly focus on reducing restraint duration and the use of hard shackles.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 21 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3