Addressing the dauntingness of formulation: The value of considering empathy as “grasping”

Abstract

Aims and objectivesTo explore the value of using Karl Jaspers’ lived experience concept of ‘grasping’ in remediating the reported dauntingness of formulation.ConclusionsFormulation can be construed as both the process and explication of understanding why a patient is presenting in a particular way. In an automatic process of abduction, ‘feeling into’ the mind of the other, hypotheses are posted to consciousness with little mental effort as meaningful connections are grasped. Subsequent more deliberative reasoning is synthesised continuously and with surprisingly little mental effort into the best explanation(s). Karl Jaspers’ introduction to Psychiatry of the concepts involved, empathy and understanding, and his aim of making their use more scientific established the ongoing, often fierce debate about the ontology of Psychiatry; empirical versus interpretive. Trainees must resolve this for themselves in explicating a formulation, risking exposure of their prejudices. Jaspers’ emphasis on the lived experience of empathic understanding that psychiatrists bring to their work found him often using the term ‘grasp’ rather than ‘empathise’. ‘Grasping’ seems to convey more vividly and meaningfully the role that empathy plays in the initial ascertainment of mood and the subsequent hypothesis discovery, testing and synthesis.