Metabolic syndrome risk prediction in an Australian sample with first-episode psychosis using the psychosis metabolic risk calculator: A validation study

Author:

Teasdale Scott B12ORCID,Ardill-Young Oliver12,Morell Rachel12,Ward Philip B13,Khandaker Golam M456,Upthegrove Rachel78,Curtis Jackie129,Perry Benjamin I1011ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Kensington, NSW, Australia

2. Mindgardens Neuroscience Network, Randwick, NSW, Australia

3. Schizophrenia Research Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District and Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia

4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

5. Centre for Academic Mental Health, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

6. MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit, Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

7. Institute for Mental Health and Centre for Human Brain Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

8. Early Intervention Service, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

9. Early Psychosis Programme, South Eastern Sydney Local Health District, Bondi Junction, NSW, Australia

10. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK and

11. Department of General Psychiatry, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK

Abstract

Objective To examine the accuracy and likely clinical usefulness of the Psychosis Metabolic Risk Calculator (PsyMetRiC) in predicting up-to six-year risk of incident metabolic syndrome in an Australian sample of young people with first-episode psychosis. Method We conducted a retrospective study at a secondary care early psychosis treatment service among people aged 16-35 years, extracting relevant data at the time of antipsychotic commencement and between one-to-six-years later. We assessed algorithm accuracy primarily via discrimination (C-statistic), calibration (calibration plots) and clinical usefulness (decision curve analysis). Model updating and recalibration generated a site-specific (Australian) PsyMetRiC version. Results We included 116 people with baseline and follow-up data: 73% male, mean age 20.1 years, mean follow-up 2.6 years, metabolic syndrome prevalence 13%. C-statistics for both partial- (C = 0.71, 95% CI 0.64–0.75) and full-models (C = 0.72, 95% CI 0.65–0.77) were acceptable; however, calibration plots demonstrated consistent under-prediction of risk. Recalibration and updating led to slightly improved C-statistics, greatly improved agreement between observed and predicted risk, and a narrow window of likely clinical usefulness improved significantly. Conclusion An updated and recalibrated PsyMetRiC model, PsyMetRiC-Australia, shows promise. Validation in a large sample is required to confirm its accuracy and clinical usefulness for the Australian population.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3