Time series forecasting using neural networks vs. Box- Jenkins methodology

Author:

Zaiyong Tang 1,de Almeida Chrys1,Fishwick Paul A.2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Decision & Information Sciences, University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611

2. Department of Computer & Information Sciences University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611

Abstract

We discuss the results of a comparative study of the performance of neural networks and conventional methods in forecasting time series. Our work was initially inspired by previously published works that yielded inconsistent results about comparative performance. We have experimented with three time series of different complexity using different feed forward, backpropagation neural network models and the standard Box-Jenkins model. Our experiments demonstrate that for time series with long memory, both methods produced comparable results. However, for series with short memory, neural networks outper formed the Box-Jenkins model. We note that some of the comparable results arise since the neural network and time series model appear to be functionally similar models. We have found that for time series of different complexities there are optimal neural network topologies and parameters that enable them to learn more efficiently. Our initial conclusions are that neural networks are robust and provide good long-term forecasting. They are also parsimonious in their data requirements. Neural networks represent a promising alternative for forecasting, but there are problems deter mining the optimal topology and parameters for efficient learning.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design,Modeling and Simulation,Software

Reference8 articles.

1. Bowerman, B.L. and O'Connell, R.T., 1987, Time Series Forecasting, 2nd. Ed. PWS Publishers, pp. 120.

2. Parallel Distributed Processing

Cited by 244 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3