The Use and Perception of Reclaimed Group Labels for Lesbian Women and Gay Men

Author:

Klysing Amanda1ORCID,Braun Maike2ORCID,Buscicchio Giulia34,Jacobs Catho5,Formanowicz Magdalena6,Fasoli Fabio7

Affiliation:

1. Lund University, Lund, Sweden

2. University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany

3. University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

4. Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research, Luxembourg, Luxembourg

5. KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

6. SWPS University, Warsaw, Poland

7. University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

Abstract

This research tests whether self-labelling with a derogatory or reclaimed label is perceived as an act of reclamation. A pilot study ( N = 102) identified English terms used to label lesbian women and gay men. The main study ( N = 276) used a between-groups vignette design in which participants read about a woman/man self-labelling with a descriptive (lesbian/gay), reclaimed (queer), or derogatory group (dyke/fag) label. We assessed perceptions of the speaker (control/influence, agency, and efficacy) and group power, label offensiveness, and the likelihood of using the label in the future. Descriptive labels were perceived as less offensive and more likely to be used compared to reclaimed and derogatory labels. For gay men, using a derogatory label compared to other labels decreased perceived agency, but did not influence control/influence and efficacy. For lesbian women, there were no differences in perceptions of power depending on the label used.

Funder

European Association of Social Psychology

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference46 articles.

1. Facets of the Fundamental Content Dimensions: Agency with Competence and Assertiveness—Communion with Warmth and Morality

2. Communal and Agentic Content in Social Cognition

3. Anonymous Queers (2009). Queers read this (pp. 1–20). https://archive.qzap.org/index.php/Detail/Object/Show/object_id/184. (Original work published 1990)

4. Slurs and appropriation: An echoic account

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3