Affiliation:
1. The Otto H. York Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering, Newark, NJ, USA
2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering, Newark, NJ, USA
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has become mainstream for precise and repeatable high-throughput fabrication of complex cell cultures and tissue constructs in drug testing and regenerative medicine, food products, dental and medical implants, biosensors, and so forth. Due to this tremendous growth in demand, an overwhelming amount of hardware manufacturers have recently flooded the market with different types of low-cost bioprinter models—a price segment that is most affordable to typical-sized laboratories. These machines range in sophistication, type of the underlying printing technology, and possible add-ons/features, which makes the selection process rather daunting (especially for a nonexpert customer). Yet, the review articles available in the literature mostly focus on the technical aspects of the printer technologies under development, as opposed to explaining the differences in what is already on the market. In contrast, this paper provides a snapshot of the fast-evolving low-cost bioprinter niche, as well as reputation profiles (relevant to delivery time, part quality, adherence to specifications, warranty, maintenance, etc.) of the companies selling these machines. Specifically, models spanning three dominant technologies—microextrusion, droplet-based/inkjet, and light-based/crosslinking—are reviewed. Additionally, representative examples of high-end competitors (including up-and-coming microfluidics-based bioprinters) are discussed to highlight their major differences and advantages relative to the low-cost models. Finally, forecasts are made based on the trends observed during this survey, as to the anticipated trickling down of the high-end technologies to the low-cost printers. Overall, this paper provides insight for guiding buyers on a limited budget toward making informed purchasing decisions in this fast-paced market.
Funder
Gustavus and Louise Pfeiffer Research Foundation
Subject
Medical Laboratory Technology,Computer Science Applications
Reference221 articles.
1. 3-dimensional bioprinting for tissue engineering applications
2. Recent advances in bone tissue engineering scaffolds
3. A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering
4. 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs
5. 3D Bioprinting Market Size, Share & Trends Analysis Report by Technology (Magnetic Levitation, Inkjet Based, Syringe Based, Laser Based), by Application, and Segment Forecasts, 2018–2024; Research and Markets: Dublin, 2018.