Respiratory mechanics evaluation of mice submitted to intravenous methacholine: Bolus vs. continuous infusion

Abstract

The application of a bronchoconstrictor, usually Methacholine (MCh), in respiratory mechanics studies is usually accompanied by the assessment of respiratory mechanics in a dose–response curve. The MCh used in the dose–response curve can be inhaled (i.h.) and intravenous (i.v.) and there are studies comparing i.v. bolus and i.h. MCh in both mice and rats. However, MCh i.v. can be injected at short time interval (bolus) or in continuous infusion. This comparison is relevant since the way MCh is applied influences the mathematical model. We chose an aging process scenario to compare both protocols. This study aims to compare respiratory mechanics of 3-, 6-, and 10-month SAMR1 mice and how both administration methods (continuous infusion and bolus) impact respiratory mechanics evaluation. Both protocols were capable of assessing the difference among ages and doses in: peak or plateau; and area under the curve analysis. The respiratory mechanics parameters were Rn, G, and H (two-way analysis of variance: groups and doses with a P < 0.05 for all). Also, the infusion protocol presented a higher sensitivity to dose increment. In conclusion, both protocols were able to discriminate intragroup and intergroup differences. In the bolus protocol, the highest value of each curve dose may not correspond to the highest real value, and the loss of this point may be a problematic factor in the sample size. These factors are not present in the infusion protocol. Additionally, at this lineage and age screening, the infusion protocol appeared to be more sensitive to differences among ages when compared to the bolus protocol. Impact statement Respiratory mechanics studies are associated with fundamental research and translational studies; the present work thus investigates this particular matter. Our current research describes differences and similarities between two different ways of administrating a very prevalent bronchoconstrictor (methacholine) in an aging process scenario. The core issue of our work is related with troubles we find with the bolus protocol and the application of the mathematical model used to assess the respiratory mechanics. Our findings reveal the continuous infusion as an alternative to these problems and we hope to provide the proper foundations to a more reliable assessment in the respiratory field.