Innovative Governance in the Indian Market Regime Through Regulatory Impact Assessment: An Analysis

Author:

Yadav Abha1,Tiwari Pooja1

Affiliation:

1. School of Competition Law and Market Regulations, Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.

Abstract

Regulatory impact assessment is necessary for determining the need for policies and a scientific, logical guide to designing them, when necessary. It involves a step-by-step approach comprising problem definition, baseline regulatory assessment, comparison of alternatives and selection of regulations that have the potential to result in the highest net benefits to society. To address inconsistencies and systematise regulatory uniformity in India, regulatory impact assessment of the Indian legislative framework has emerged as a much-needed impetus. Innovative governance system may be employed as a mechanism by regulatory bodies that shall ensure effective steering of regulatory impact assessment process. Aligning with the laid regulatory goals and objectives, this process backed by innovative technologies may further assist in managing the complex and cross-functional regulatory activities. We try to shift the narrative from ‘governance and technology’ where a friction between the two could be a presupposition to the concept of ‘governance with technology’ which is all encompassing and enabling. In this article, we will analyse the need and scope of regulatory impact assessment within the existing Indian legal regime. To weigh potential risks and trade-offs in the regulatory sector, we will further explore the impact of regulatory assessment on competitiveness in the market. Thereafter, we will examine the use and adaptation of regulatory impact assessment tools. Lastly, we will explore the scope for the use of technological innovations in conducting regulatory impact assessment in India.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Boyfield K. (2007). RIAs: Why don’t they work? A submission to the Business Council for Britain. Centre for Policy Studies. https://cps.org.uk/research/rias-why-dont-they-work-a-submission-to-the-business-council-of-britain/

2. Committee for Economic Development. (2017). Regulation & the economy: The relationship & how to improve it: A policy statement by the committee for economic development of the conference board. https://www.ced.org/reports/regulation-and-the-economy

3. Competition & Market Authority. (2020). Regulation and competition: A Review of the Evidence. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/857024/Regulation_and_Competition_report_-_web_version.pdf

4. Competition Commission of India. (2006, March 17). Inaugural address of Dr. Rangarajan C., Chairman, Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister. In workshop on competition assessment and regulatory impact analysis: Instrument for competition advocacy draft. https://www.cci.gov.in/sites/default/files/event_pdf/17_c_ranagarajan.pdf

5. CUTS International. (n.d.). Regulatory impact assessment toolkit: A practitioner’s guide in developing countries. https://cuts-ccier.org/pdf/Regulatory_Impact_Assessment_Toolkit.pdf

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Regulatory lag, efficiency, and performance. Lessons from a case study;Competition and Regulation in Network Industries;2024-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3