How should platforms be archived? On sustainable use practices of a Telegram Archive to study Russia’s war against Ukraine

Author:

Bareikytė Miglė1ORCID,Makhortykh Mykola2ORCID,Martin Alexander3,Nazaruk Taras45,Skop Yarden3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder), Germany

2. University of Bern, Switzerland

3. University of Siegen, Germany

4. Center for Urban History, Ukraine

5. FernUniversität in Hagen, Germany

Abstract

After Russia’s war against Ukraine destroyed people’s ability to move and communicate freely in Ukraine, many Ukrainians turned to social media and messenger apps, especially Telegram, to produce and share information. The vast amount of this digital data is privatized, ephemeral, and difficult to utilize for research, raising urgent questions about its sustainable accessibility and usability. In this article, we explore a specific aspect of digital archive sustainability – the use of digital archives to preserve platform data related to Russia’s war against Ukraine – by focusing on data integrity, usability, and ethics. Our research is based on a case study of an interdisciplinary Data Sprint, “Russia’s War in Ukraine,” organized in collaboration with a Telegram Archive, in which academics and practitioners investigated qualitative approaches to studying a war on Telegram. In the article, we explore the possibilities and drawbacks of sustainable use of the Telegram Archive for qualitative approaches – semantic, visual, spatial, and link analysis – to working with large amounts of data. We argue that the sustainability of digital archives depends not only on their use, based on consistently stored and accessible data, but also the ethical aspects of their use for diverse research needs.

Funder

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference70 articles.

1. Social media data archives in an API-driven world

2. Platform Surveillance and Resistance in Iran and Russia: The Case of Telegram

3. ANU (2020) Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories (APSR). Available at: https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/6614 (accessed 9 August 2023).

4. Disappearing acts: Content moderation and emergent practices to preserve at-risk human rights–related content

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3