Mind the Gap: Facebook’s measures against information disorder do not go far enough

Author:

de-Lima-Santos Mathias-Felipe123ORCID,Ceron Wilson3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

2. Macquarie University, Australia

3. Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

In recent decades, a revolutionary transformation has substantially altered the way people access information. Online social media platforms have become a significant facet of our daily lives. The intersection of political discourse with the proliferation of what is commonly termed as “fake news” on these platforms has given rise to an environment that does not necessarily foster independent and critical thinking, thereby posing substantial risks to individuals, industries, and governments. While Facebook has implemented novel strategies to counteract this challenge, their efficacy remains questionable. Drawing from an analysis of fact-checking activities conducted during two Brazilian elections, this study aims to illuminate the key areas of focus within corrective information and assess its impact on Facebook. Our examination also highlights our critique of the lack of standardized measures, utilizing Meta’s tool (CrowdTangle) for this qualitative study. Ultimately, our study concludes by offering insights into potential policy alternatives that could be adopted to address this phenomenon.

Funder

RPA’s Humane AI

H2020 Excellent Science

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference29 articles.

1. BBC (2017) Facebook ditches fake news warning flag. BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42438750 (accessed 1 March 2024).

2. In Related News, That Was Wrong: The Correction of Misinformation Through Related Stories Functionality in Social Media

3. Fake news agenda in the era of COVID-19: Identifying trends through fact-checking content

4. Fact Checking the Campaign

5. Costa S (2020). #Verificamos: Vídeo que mostra idosa sendo vacinada contra Covid-19 é de dezembro, e não de outubro. Lupa. Available at: https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/lupa/2020/12/11/verificamos-idosa-vacinada-covid-19-dezembro-outubro/ (accessed 1 March 2024).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3