Affiliation:
1. Danish Institute for Human Rights, Denmark
2. University of Denmark, Denmark
Abstract
The way in which we describe processes of automation, the digital society and the technology companies that deliver many of its services carry implicit and sometimes contradicting values and ideas about the society envisioned. In this paper, we are interested in unfolding some of the metaphors that guide political discourses on digitalisation in Denmark, particularly those related to the nexus between the welfare state and the market. We propose that metaphorical analysis of policy documents serves to tease out and confront the implicit values and tensions related to how welfare ideologies are reconciled with market logics. This carries important messages about the Danish government’s imaginary of digitalisation and citizens, such as which role citizens are expected to play vis-à-vis digital services and welfare provisions. This paper argues that in contrast to the EU’s declared goal of human-centric digitalisation, the Danish government relies on metaphors that are technology-centric rather than human-centric.
Funder
Independent Research Fund Denmark
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Communication
Reference36 articles.
1. AI HLEG (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (accessed 12 April 2019).
2. Andrade NNGd (2010) Technology and Metaphors: From Cyberspace to Ambient Intelligence. Observatorio (OBS), 4(1): 121–146. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1703090
3. Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献