Author:
Guevremont Nathan,Barnes Mark,Haupt Claudia E.
Abstract
The scope and severity of the opioid epidemic in the United States has prompted significant legislative intrusion into the patient-physician relationship. These proscriptive regulatory regimes mirror earlier legislation in other politically-charged domains like abortion and gun regulation. We draw on lessons from those contexts to argue that states should consider integrating their responses to the epidemic with existing medical regulatory structures, making physicians partners rather than adversaries in addressing this public health crisis.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects
Reference143 articles.
1. “The Role of State Medical Boards,”;Carlson;Virtual Mentor,2005
2. Reporting child abuse: pediatricians’ experiences with the child protection system
3. Physicians' Mandatory Reporting of Elder Abuse
4. 28. See Webb v. United States, 249 U.S. 96 (1919) (finding that a physician could not prescribe morphine to an individual with addiction because it would not "cure" his addiction but maintain his use)
5. United States v. Doremus, 249 U.S. 86 (1919)
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献