Determination of Death by Neurologic Criteria in the United States: The Case for Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act

Author:

Lewis Ariane,Bonnie Richard J.,Pope Thaddeus,Epstein Leon G.,Greer David M.,Kirschen Matthew P.,Rubin Michael,Russell James A.

Abstract

Although death by neurologic criteria (brain death) is legally recognized throughout the United States, state laws and clinical practice vary concerning three key issues: (1) the medical standards used to determine death by neurologic criteria, (2) management of family objections before determination of death by neurologic criteria, and (3) management of religious objections to declaration of death by neurologic criteria. The American Academy of Neurology and other medical stakeholder organizations involved in the determination of death by neurologic criteria have undertaken concerted action to address variation in clinical practice in order to ensure the integrity of brain death determination. To complement this effort, state policymakers must revise legislation on the use of neurologic criteria to declare death. We review the legal history and current laws regarding neurologic criteria to declare death and offer proposed revisions to the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA) and the rationale for these recommendations.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference142 articles.

1. 93. President's Commission, supra note 17; see also supra Section II.F.

2. 78. In re Haymer, 450 N.E.2d 940 (Ill. App. 1983); Fla. Stat. § 765.511; Haw. Rev. Stat. § 327C-1; Iowa Code § 702.8; Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 446.400; La. Stat. Ann. § 9:111; Md. Code, Com. Law § 5–202; Minn. Stat. § 145.135; Mo. Rev. Stat. § 194.005; N.J. Rev. Stat. § 26:6A; N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-323; Tex. Health & Safety Code § 671.001; Va. Code Ann. § 54.1-2972; Ga. Code. Ann. § 31-10-16.

3. 74. Winkfield v. Rosen, No. RG15760730 (Alameda County Sup. Ct., Cal. Dec. 22, 2017) (Declaration of D. Alan Shewmon, filed with Plaintiffs' Motion to Bifurcate the Issue of Whether AAN and AAP Guidelines Meet the Statutory Definition of “Dead” Under the Uniform Determination of Death Act).

4. 101. In re A.C., No. DG-16-08 (Pondera County Dist. Ct., Mont. Sept. 23, 2016).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3