Social Solidarity in Health Care, American-Style

Author:

Fuse Brown Erin C.,Lawrence Matthew B.,McCuskey Elizabeth Y.,Wiley Lindsay F.

Abstract

The ACA shifted U.S. health policy from centering on principles of actuarial fairness toward social solidarity. Yet four legal fixtures of the health care system have prevented the achievement of social solidarity: federalism, fiscal pluralism, privatization, and individualism. Future reforms must confront these fixtures to realize social solidarity in health care, American-style.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference132 articles.

1. 133. See L.F. Wiley, supra note 92; M.B. Lawrence, supra note 53.

2. 28. See, e.g., J. Biden, “Health Care,” available at (“IV. Ensure Health Care is a Right for All, Not a Privilege for Just a Few,”); B. Sanders, “Health Care as a Human Right — Medicare for All,” available at ; E. Warren, “Health Care is a Basic Human Right,” available at . See also, e.g., Buttigieg, supra note 23; A. Yang, “A New Way Forward for Healthcare in America,” December 16, 2019, available at , (“As Democrats, we all believe in healthcare as a human right.”) (last visited June 30, 2020).

3. 3. See, e.g. Durkheim, E. , The Division of Labor in Society (Simon & Shuster ed. 1997, originally published in 1893) 24-25 (“[The] visible symbol [of social solidarity] is the law. Indeed where social solidarity exists, in spite of its non-material nature, it does not remain in a state of pure potentiality, but shows its presence through perceptible effects. Where it is strong it attracts men strongly to one another, ensures frequent contacts between them, and multiples the opportunities available to them to enter into mutual relationships…. [I] t is not easy to say whether it is social solidarity that produces these phenomena or on the contrary, whether it is the result of them. Likewise it is a moot point whether men draw closer to one another because of the strong effects of social solidarity, or whether it is strong because men have come closer together.”).

4. 42. E.g., Texas v. U.S., 945 F.3d 355 (5th Cir. 2019) (Majority Opinion, IV.A.).

5. 76. 42 U.S.C. §1903(i)(26).

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Solidarity and Public Health;Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy;2022-06-09

2. Introduction;Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics;2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3