A Study to Elicit Behavioral Health Patients' and Providers' Opinions on Health Records Consent

Author:

Grando Maria Adela,Murcko Anita,Mahankali Srividya,Saks Michael,Zent Michael,Chern Darwyn,Dye Christy,Sharp Richard,Young Laura,Davis Patricia,Hiestand Megan,Hassanzadeh Neda

Abstract

A main objective of this study is to assess the opinions of 50 behavioral health patients on selective control over their behavioral and physical health information. We explored patients' preferences regarding current consent models, what health information should be shared for care and research and whether these preferences vary based on the sensitivity of health information and/or the type of provider involved. The other objective of this study was to solicit opinions of 8 behavioral health providers on patient-driven granular control of health information and potential impact on care.Electronic surveys were implemented at an outpatient Behavioral Health facility that provides care for behavioral health patients with non-serious mental illnesses. The Patient Survey included questions regarding patients' demographics and about their concerns and preferences for data sharing for care and research. The Provider Survey included questions about their view on the current consent process and perceptions on barriers and facilitators to implement patient-controlled granular consent models.This novel study provides valuable preliminary data that can help guide future studies to better understand privacy choices of this underrepresented patient group.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects

Reference34 articles.

1. 2. NCVHS for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, “Privacy and Confidentiality in the Nationwide Health Information Network,” available at (last visited May 24, 2017).

2. 6. “Nationwide Privacy and Security Framework for Electronic Exchange of Individually Identifiable Health Information,” available at (last visited May 24, 2017);

3. 19. See Dhopeshwarkar, , supra note 5.

4. 17. “Behavioral Health Information Network of Arizona, Consent Model Opt-In Versus Opt-Out,” available at (password protected; last visited March 4, 2016).

5. 15. “Arizona Health e-Connection. The Right Information to the Right Person, at the Right Time, for the Right Purpose,” available at (last visited May 24, 2017).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3