Radiographic Detection of Marginal Impaction in Supination-Adduction Ankle Fractures

Author:

Alluri Ram K.1,Hill J. Ryan1,Donohoe Steven1,Fleming Mark2,Tan Eric1,Marecek Geoffrey1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Keck Medical Center of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

2. Navy Trauma Training Center, Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence of plafond impaction in supination-adduction type II (SAD-II) ankle fractures and assess the accuracy of plain radiographs in detecting plafond impaction and predicting planned operative management compared to computed tomography (CT). Methods: Patients with SAD-II ankle fractures were retrospectively identified. All SAD-II plain radiographs were reviewed (120 fractures) and compared to CT images (55 fractures). For each plain radiograph or CT scan, 3 orthopedic surgeons were asked the following questions: (1) Is there impaction of the tibial plafond? (2) Does the impaction require direct visualization and articular reduction? The incidence of plafond impaction and the preoperative plan were calculated separately for plain radiographs and CT scans. The accuracy of plain radiographs was calculated using responses from corresponding CT imaging as the gold standard. Change in preoperative management decisions after reviewing CT images was also calculated. Results: In 120 SAD-II ankle fracture plain radiographs, marginal impaction of the plafond was visualized in 61% of fractures. The diagnosis of impaction using plain radiographs was correct in 84% of fractures when compared to CT imaging, resulting in a 91% positive predictive value (PPV) and a 55% negative predictive value (NPV). Plain radiographs were able to predict planned operative management after review of CT imaging with an 87% PPV and 75% NPV. Conclusion: The majority of SAD-II ankle fractures involved marginal impaction of the tibial plafond. Plain radiographs were accurate in diagnosing impaction when it was present, but were not accurate in ruling out impaction. In the presence of impaction, CT likely will not change planned operative management. Level of Evidence: Level III, comparative series.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3