Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Intraarticular Calcaneal Fracture: A Prospective Propensity Score Matched Cohort Study With 2-Year Follow-up

Author:

Ahluwalia Raju123ORCID,Lewis Thomas Lorchan12ORCID,Musbahi Omar1,Reichert Ines123

Affiliation:

1. King’s College Hospital (Denmark Hill), Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

2. King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

3. Surgical and Trauma Academic Research (STAR) Alliance, King’s College Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Background: Optimal management of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures remains controversial. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of minimally invasive surgery vs nonoperative treatment in displaced intraarticular calcaneal fracture up to 2 years. Methods: All displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures between August 2014 and January 2019 that presented to a level 1 trauma center were considered for inclusion. The decision to treat was made by a multidisciplinary team consisting of fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeons. Operative treatment protocol involved sinus tarsi approach or percutaneous reduction and internal fixation. Nonoperative protocol involved symptomatic management with no attempt at closed reduction. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and EuroQol–5 Dimensions–5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess foot and ankle and general health related quality of life outcomes, respectively, at 2-year follow-up. Radiographic assessment was performed based on preinjury and 12-week postinjury radiographs. Results: A total of 101 patients were included for analysis between August 2014 and January 2019. We propensity score matched 46 patients in the surgical cohort to 46 patients in the nonsurgical cohort. At 24 months, there was no significant difference in the MOXFQ Index score ( P > .05); however, the surgical cohort had a significantly higher EQ-5D-5L Index score ( P < .05) and return to work (91% vs 72%, P < .05) and physical activity rate (46 vs 35%, P < .05) despite a higher proportion of more complex fractures in the surgical cohort. The wound complication rate following surgery was 16%. In addition, 14% of patients in the nonoperative cohort subsequently underwent arthrodesis compared with none of the patients in the surgical cohort. Conclusion: In this study, we found that operative treatments were associated with low rates of surgical complication at 2 years and long-term pain improvement, facilitating earlier and better functional outcomes for complex injury patterns compared with nonoperative treatment for less severe fractures. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3