Perioperative Impact of Early Limited Surgical Intervention to Treat Pilon Fractures

Author:

Hreha Jeremy1,Metrione Michael D.1ORCID,Reilly Mark C.1,Sirkin Michael S.1,Adams Mark R.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rutgers–New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA

Abstract

Background: The operative treatment of pilon fractures is classically treated with a staged protocol with ankle spanning external fixator, followed by definitive open reduction and internal fixation in order to decrease risk of soft tissue complications and infection. However, treatment of pilon fractures with patrial tibial fixation in addition to ankle spanning external fixation at the time of index procedure may facilitate final fixation while avoiding complications that were associated with acute definitive fixation. Methods: Retrospective cohort series of 113 patients treated for pilon fractures from September 2012 to November 2018 at a single level 1 trauma center. Charts were reviewed to compare patients who underwent traditional management with a staged protocol and those who had a limited tibial reduction and fixation (LTRF) during the index procedure. The main outcome measurement was time to definitive fixation. Results: Twenty-six percent of patients (29 of 113) had limited tibial reduction and fixation (LTRF) during index surgery. Mean time between index procedure and definitive ORIF was 4.75 days less for LTRF cohort compared to standard stage cohort (10.86 ± 7.44 vs. 15.61 ± 8.59 days, P = .009). The index procedure took on average 51 minutes longer in the LTRF cohort ( P < .001), yet definitive procedure operative time was decreased by an average of 98 minutes ( P < .001), and overall (index plus definitive) operative duration was shortened by an average of 50 minutes ( P = .044). There was no difference in rate of infection between LTRF (3.1%) and traditional treatment (2.5%) ( P = .86) or reduction quality ( P = .270). There were no nonunions in either treatment group. Conclusion: Patients who had LTRF had quicker time to definitive ORIF and decreased operative time for definitive ORIF. There was no difference in infection rate, reduction quality, or nonunion rate between groups. Level of Evidence: Level IV, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3