Effect of Insurance on Rates of Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Arthrodesis for Tibiotalar Osteoarthritis

Abstract

Background: Several studies have examined the effect of insurance on the management of various orthopedic conditions. The purpose of our study was to assess the effect of insurance and other demographic factors on the operative management of tibiotalar osteoarthritis. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database was used to identify patients who underwent a total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) or tibiotalar arthrodesis (TTA) for tibiotalar osteoarthritis. Insurance status was identified for each patient, and the proportions of each insurance type were computed for each operative modality. A multivariate analysis was performed to account for confounding variables to isolate the effect of insurance type on operative treatment. Results: From 2007 to 2012, a total of 10 010 patients (35.6%) were identified who underwent a total ankle replacement (TAR) procedure and 18 094 patients (64.4%%) who underwent TTA for tibiotalar osteoarthritis. Patients receiving a TAR were older (65.8 vs 64.2, P < .001), more likely to be female (54% vs 51%, P < .001), and had fewer comorbidities (4.2 vs 4.5, P < .001) than patients who underwent a TTA. After controlling for baseline differences, patients with Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 3.00, P < .001), and private insurance (OR 3.19, P < .001) were approximately 3 times more likely to undergo TAR than patients with Medicaid. Conclusions: Patients with tibiotalar osteoarthritis were more likely to receive a TAR procedure if they had Medicare or private insurance compared with patients who had Medicaid. Further research should be done to better understand the drivers of this phenomenon if equitable care is to be achieved. Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study.