Fixation Comparison for Chevron Osteotomies

Author:

Crosby Lynn A.1,Bozarth Gordon R.2

Affiliation:

1. Professor and Chairman, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee/Chattanooga Unit, Chattanooga, Tennessee.

2. Medical student, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.

Abstract

A comparison study of temporary K-wire fixation, permanent Herbert Whipple screw fixation, versus no osteotomy fixation was performed on distal chevron osteotomies for hallux valgus deformities. Nineteen chevron osteotomies were performed on 17 patients. Six patients received a Herbert Whipple screw for fixation, seven patients received temporary K-wire fixation, and six patients received no fixation for the chevron osteotomy. The average postoperative hallux valgus (HV) angle improved by 7.1° with no fixation, 6.3° with temporary K-wire fixation, and 9.5° with Herbert Whipple screw fixation. Comparison of the three groups using the Student's t-test revealed no statistical difference between the three groups ( P = 0.6). The increased anesthesia time and operative costs for Herbert Whipple screw fixation was found to be statistically significant in comparison with the use of no fixation ( P = <0.001). Time and cost studies were not significantly different for the K-wire and no fixation groups. Follow-up averaged 3.3 years. All patients reported satisfaction with the procedure and an improvement of their preoperative complaints. No significant difference in patient satisfaction was found to exist between the groups receiving fixation and those who did not have fixation. The results of this study can find no long-term benefit when comparing costs and patient satisfaction with the use of any temporary or permanent fixation of osteotomy sites when performing chevron osteotomies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3