Interdigital Neuroma: Intermuscular Neuroma Transposition Compared with Resection

Author:

Colgrove Robert C.1,Huang Emily Y.2,Barth Alan H.3,Greene Marie A.4

Affiliation:

1. Staff Orthopedist, Orthopedic Dept., Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California

2. Second Year Resident, Podiatric Residency Program, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California

3. Staff Podiatrist, Orthopedic Dept., Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California

4. Staff Registered Nurse Practitioner, Orthopedic Dept., Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, California

Abstract

This prospective, randomized study compares the treatment of an interdigital neuroma (IDN) by the standard resection operation with a technique in which the IDN is transposed into the inter-muscular space between the adductor hallucis and the interossei muscles after division of the digital nerves distal to the IDN. The resection group contained 22 patients and 22 neuromas and the transposition group contained 22 patients and 23 neuromas. An interviewer, blinded as to the operative technique used, telephoned each patient preoperatively, and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 36–48 months postoperatively. The interviewer recorded the patient's reported pain level on a numerical rating scale of 0 to 100. In the resection group the average pain level was slightly lower through the first 6 month period, but at the 12 month review the resection group had a slightly higher average pain level. At the 36–48 month survey the resection group again reported a greater average pain level and fewer asymptomatic patients. It was concluded that it is unnecessary to excise the IDN to obtain excellent relief of pain. It was also concluded that transposition of the IDN into an intermuscular position between the adductor hallucis and the interossei muscles produced significantly better long term results than did the standard resection operation.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 44 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3