Affiliation:
1. Bioscience Laboratory, Center for Nursing Research, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA,
2. Bioscience Laboratory, Center for Nursing Research, School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, USA
Abstract
Investigators commonly assess intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation (CVs) to estimate the precision of salivary cortisol enzyme immunoassay (EIA). However, little guidance is available as to which samples to use for CV assessment. The purposes of this methodological study were to compare differences in intra- and inter-assay CVs (a) among controls, standards, and/or unknown samples; and (b) between fresh and previously frozen saliva. A total of 174 duplicates (controls = 58, standards = 48, and unknowns = 68) were tested. The unknowns were from 34 students; all student saliva was assayed as both fresh and frozen samples. All samples were assayed in duplicate, using a commercial salivary cortisol EIA kit, by the same technician with the same equipment. A priori criteria for intra- and inter-assay CV, respectively, were ≤ 4% and ≤ 7%, and a was .05 for CV differences. Mean intra-assay CVs for controls, standards, unknowns, and combined samples were ≤ 2.5%, and mean inter-assay CVs were ≤ 2.8%. Mean intra-assay CVs were 2.2% for fresh saliva and 1.5% for frozen samples. Comparisons showed no significant differences in intra- or inter-assay CV among controls, standards, and/or unknown samples. Inter-assay CV was significantly different between fresh and previously frozen saliva (p = .043), with fresh saliva CV higher than frozen; the difference was not meaningful because all evaluations showed minimal measurement error. In conclusion, results indicate that estimation of precision can be achieved by testing of controls, standards, or unknowns and with either fresh or frozen saliva in this population.
Reference32 articles.
1. Baum, A. & Grunberg, N. ( 1997). Measurement of stress hormones. In S. Cohen, R. C. Kessler , & L. Gorden (Eds.), Measuring stress: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 175-192). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Estimation of the coefficient of variation from laboratory analysis of split specimens for quality control in clinical trials
3. DeKeyser, F.G. & Pugh, L.C. ( 1991). Approaches to physiologic measurement. In C. F. Waltz, O. L. Strickland , & E. R. Lenz (Eds.), Measurement in nursing research (2nd, (ed.) pp. 387-412). Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
Cited by
49 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献