Economic Impact and Health Care Utilization Outcomes of Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Interventions for Persons With Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Future Research

Author:

Whitehouse Christina R.1,Haydon-Greatting Starlin2,Srivastava Sneha Baxi3,Brady Veronica J.4,Blanchette Julia E.5ORCID,Smith Tierra1,Yehl Kirsten E.6,Kauwetuitama Adonica Ihilani5,Litchman Michelle L.5ORCID,Bzowyckyj Andrew S.7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Villanova University Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova, Pennsylvania

2. SHG Clinical Consulting/Illinois Pharmacists Association-PSMP, Springfield, Illinois

3. Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, Illinois

4. University of Texas Cizik School of Nursing, Houston, Texas

5. University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City, Utah

6. Association of Diabetes Care & Education Specialists, Chicago, Illinois

7. Pacific University Oregon School of Pharmacy, Hillsboro, Oregon

Abstract

Purpose Value-driven outcomes are important because health systems determine sustainability of diabetes self-management education and support (DSMES) programming. Health care utilization and clinical outcomes are critical factors when considering the impact of DSMES programs. Objective The aim of this systematic review was to describe studies that report on the economic and health care utilization outcomes of diabetes self-management programs. Methods A systematic literature review was performed in multiple databases. Studies reporting economic and health care utilization outcomes related to DSMES and including 1 or more of the ADCES7 Self-Care BehaviorsTM from January 2006 to May 2020 were included. Eligible articles needed to compare the intervention and comparison group and report on economic impact. The methodological quality was assessed with the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist specific to each individual study design. Results A total of 22 of 14 556 articles published between 2007 and 2020 were included. Cost benefits varied, and there were considerable methodological heterogeneity among design, economic measures, population, perspective, intervention, and biophysical outcomes. Conclusion DSMES interventions may positively impact economic outcomes and/or health care utilization, although not all studies showed consistent benefit. This review highlights an evidence gap, and future health economic evaluations are warranted.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference54 articles.

1. CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence of both diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes. Diabetes. Published August 7, 2020. Accessed April 8, 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/diagnosed-undiagnosed-diabetes.html

2. Diabetes 2030: Insights from Yesterday, Today, and Future Trends

3. CDC. National diabetes statistics report, 2020. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published February 11, 2020. Accessed February 28, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/library/features/diabetes-stat-report.html

4. Resurgence of Diabetes-Related Nontraumatic Lower-Extremity Amputation in the Young and Middle-Aged Adult U.S. Population

5. Diabetic Kidney Disease

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3