Feasibility and Performance of Hemoglobin A1C Self-Testing During COVID-19 Among African Americans With Type 2 Diabetes

Author:

Woo Jihun1,Whyne Erum Z.1,Wright Jaylen I.1,Lehrer H. Matthew2,Alhalimi Taha A.1,Wang Tianyu1,Saba Victoria C.1,Dubois Susan K.13,Tanaka Hirofumi1,Brown Sharon A.4,Steinhardt Mary A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, College of Education, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

2. Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

3. Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

4. School of Nursing, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the feasibility of implementing A1C self-testing at home using the A1CNow® Self Check and to compare the accuracy of the A1CNow to a reference standard in African Americans with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods: African American adults with T2D were recruited from 13 different churches (N = 123). Phase 1, conducted during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, examined the feasibility of A1C assessment using the A1CNow performed at home by untrained participants. Phase 2, conducted when in-person research resumed, compared A1C values concurrently measured using the A1CNow and the DCA Vantage™ Analyzer (reference standard) collected by research staff at church testing sites. Results: In Phase 1, 98.8% of participants successfully completed at least 1 at-home A1C test; the overall failure rate was 24.7%. In Phase 2, the failure rate of staff-performed A1CNow testing was 4.4%. The Bland-Altman plot reveals that A1CNow values were 0.68% lower than DCA values, and the mean differences (A1CNow minus DCA) ranged from −2.6% to 1.2% with a limit of agreement between −1.9% to 0.5%. Conclusions: A1C self-testing is feasible for use in community settings involving African American adults with T2D. The A1CNow Self-Check underestimated A1C values when compared with the reference standard. Ongoing improvements in point-of-care devices have the potential to expand research and clinical care, especially in underserved communities.

Funder

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous),Health (social science),Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Reference23 articles.

1. Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2017

2. Projection of the year 2050 burden of diabetes in the US adult population: dynamic modeling of incidence, mortality, and prediabetes prevalence

3. Prevalence of and Trends in Diabetes Among Adults in the United States, 1988-2012

4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National diabetes statistics report, 2017: estimates of diabetes and its burden in the United States. Accessed December 16, 2021. https://dev.diabetes.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/cdc-statistics-report-2017.pdf

5. Self-Care Disparities Among Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the USA

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3