Common (Mis)Perceptions About IRB Review of Human Subjects Research-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Common (Mis)Perceptions About IRB Review of Human Subjects Research

Published:2005-06-23 Issue:3 Volume:18 Page:264-270
ISSN:0894-3184
Container-title:Nursing Science Quarterly
language:en
Short-container-title:Nurs Sci Q

Author:

Lynn Mary R.¹,Nelson Daniel K.²

Affiliation:

1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

2. Office of Human Research Ethics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina

Abstract

Every researcher who conducts research involving human subjects for their data has experiences with one or more institutional review boards. Some view their institutional review board experiences as helpful; others view them as painful and obstructive. However, there are many misperceptions about institutional review boards and their operation. Some common misperceptions are presented and discussed in an effort to correct false views held by researchers.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Nursing

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0894318405277534

Reference5 articles.

1. Ethics and Clinical Research

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A case study of researchers’ knowledge and opinions about the ethical review process for research in Botswana;Research Ethics;2016-11-03

2. Unique requirements for social science human subjects research within the United States Department of Defense;Research Ethics;2016-01-22

3. Projects not initiated by investigators: A retrospective analysis of the queries raised by the institutional ethics committees of a teaching hospital;Journal of Postgraduate Medicine;2014

4. Cuál es su papel en la protección de los participantes de las investigaciones;Nursing (Ed. española);2012-11

5. Cuál es su papel en la protección de los participantes de las investigaciones;Nursing (Ed. española);2012-08