Developing Nursing Knowledge: Practice Issues Raised from Four Philosophical Perspectives

Author:

Roy Callista L.1

Affiliation:

1. Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA

Abstract

Analysis and comparison of emerging perspectives in nursing on some of the key issues of practice theory can create an enhanced vision of the discipline. Four philosophy-of-science perspectives — realism, relativism, interpretivism, and humanism — are catalysts for fruitful insights about practice. However, together they generate more questions than they answer, both from each perspective and from the intersection of the assumptions of the four philosophies about the nature of knowledge. The nature of knowledge for practice emerges from examining how the philosophical basis and the derived practice theories address such issues as the phenomena of the discipline, environment, teleology, and nursing theoretical frameworks. This is the time for good debate and collaborative knowledge-building among scholars of various persuasions within a milieu of ethos, pathos, and logic.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Nursing

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Situation-Specific Theories: Philosophical Roots, Properties, and Approach;Situation Specific Theories: Development, Utilization, and Evaluation in Nursing;2021

2. For Future Development of Situation-Specific Theories;Situation Specific Theories: Development, Utilization, and Evaluation in Nursing;2021

3. The Status Quo of Situation-Specific Theories;Situation Specific Theories: Development, Utilization, and Evaluation in Nursing;2021

4. Conceptual and Operational Definitions of the Defining Characteristics and Related Factors of the Diagnosis Ineffective Health Management in People With Heart Failure;International Journal of Nursing Knowledge;2015-11-09

5. The Status Quo of Situation-Specific Theories;Research and Theory for Nursing Practice;2014

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3