Affiliation:
1. Colorado State University
Abstract
Word processing programs now allow instructors to provide online personalized, detailed critiques of students’ writing assignments. The article discusses the advantages of online critiquing assignments using the Track Changes, Comment, and AutoCorrect functions. It provides guidelines for online critiquing and grading of student assignments, including preparing students for online grading, preparing for online critiquing, setting policies, orienting students to sending e-mail attachments, avoiding pitfalls, and developing time-saving strategies for online critiquing of student assignments.
Subject
General Business, Management and Accounting,Communication,Business and International Management
Reference8 articles.
1. Dayton, D. (1998). Technical editing online: The quest for transparent technology. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 28, 202-221.
2. Dayton, D. (2003). Electronic editing in technical communication: A survey of practices and attitudes. Technical Communication, 50, 192-205.
3. Dragga, S. (1991). Responding to technical writing. The Technical Writing Teacher, 18, 202-221.
4. Duffy, T. M. (1995). Designing tools to aid technical editors: A needs analysis. Technical Communication, 42, 262-277.
5. Online editing, mark-up models, and the workplace lives of editors and writers
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献