What Is the Evidence Supporting Osteobiologic Use in Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

What Is the Evidence Supporting Osteobiologic Use in Revision Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion?

Published:2024-02 Issue:2_suppl Volume:14 Page:173-178
ISSN:2192-5682
Container-title:Global Spine Journal
language:en
Short-container-title:Global Spine Journal

Author:

Muthu Sathish¹²^ORCID,Diniz Sara Elisa³,Viswanathan Vibhu Krishnan²⁴,Hsieh Patrick C.⁵,Abedi Aidin⁶⁷,Yoon Tim⁸^ORCID,Meisel Hans Jörg⁹^ORCID,Buser Zorica¹⁰¹¹^ORCID,Rodrigues-Pinto Ricardo³¹²¹³^ORCID,Knowledge Forum Degenerative AO Spine¹⁴

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedics, Government Medical College, Dindigul, India.

2. Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.

3. Department of Orthopaedics, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal

4. Department of Musculoskeletal Oncology, University of Calgary, Alberta, CA

5. Department of Neurological Surgery, USC Spine Center, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA

6. Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

7. USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

8. Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA

9. Department of Neurosurgery, BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Germany

10. Gerling Institute, Brooklyn, NY, USA

11. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA

12. Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto, Portugal

13. Hospital CUF Trindade, Porto, Portugal

14. AO Spine, AO Foundation, Davos, Switzerland

Abstract

Study design Systematic literature review Objective To analyze the literature and describe the evidence supporting osteobiologic use in revision anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery. Methods A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases was conducted for literature reporting the use of osteobiologics in revision ACDF. We searched for studies reporting outcomes of using any osteobiologic use in revision ACDF surgeries (independently of the number of levels) in the above databases. Results There are currently no studies in the literature describing the outcome and comparative efficacy of diverse osteobiologic agents in the context of revision ACDF surgery. A majority of the current evidence is based only upon studies involving primary ACDF surgery. Conclusion The current study highlights the paucity of literature evidence on the role of diverse osteobiologics in revision ACDF, and foregrounds the need for high-quality evidence on this subject.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Link

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/21925682221133751

Reference22 articles.

1. A Randomized Control Trial Comparing Local Autografts and Allografts in Single Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using a StandAlone Cage

2. Complications of anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

3. Management of Symptomatic Cervical Spine Pseudarthrosis: A Suggested Algorithm for Surgical Planning

4. Pseudarthrosis rate following anterior cervical discectomy with fusion using an allograft cellular bone matrix: a multi-institutional analysis

5. Outcomes and revision rates following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion