Affiliation:
1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Scranton, PA, USA
2. Northeast Orthopaedic Surgery Residency, Geisinger, Wilkes-Barren, PA, USA
3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
4. Department of Neurosurgery, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA, USA
Abstract
Study Design Retrospective chart review. Objectives Lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) can be achieved with various techniques. Evidence supporting the long-term clinical advantages of one technique over another are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to (1) determine the changes in sagittal parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and post-operative phase, (2) evaluate the radiographic maintenance of these parameters over time, and (3) compare the demographics and patient reported outcomes of patients undergoing various LIF techniques. Methods We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with degenerative spine disease undergoing single level anterior (ALIF), lateral (LLIF), posterior (PLIF), or transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion. Data collected included patient demographics and diagnosis at time of surgery. Upright lumbar radiographs taken pre-operatively, intra-operatively, and post-operatively were measured for lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), posterior disc height (PDH), and foraminal height (FH). Results 194 patients in a single center were included. PDH and FH increased intra-operatively following ALIF ( P < .0001), PLIF ( P < .0001), LLIF ( P < .0001), and TLIF ( P < .0001). SL also increased intra-operatively for ALIF ( P = .002) and LLIF ( P = .0007). Compared to intra-operative radiographs, PDH and FH decreased at latest post-operative phase for ALIF ( P < .03), LLIF ( P < .003), TLIF ( P < .001), and PLIF ( P < .005). SL decreased for ALIF ( P = .0008), and TLIF ( P = .02). LL did not change postoperatively across techniques. Patient reported outcomes improved post-surgically and disability index decreased, but neither differed between techniques. Conclusion LIF, regardless of technique, was shown to provide significant radiographic changes in PDH and FH. Techniques utilizing larger intervertebral cage sizes (ALIF/LLIF) improved SL. Single level LIF did not affect overall LL. No single technique displayed superior radiographic robustness over time.