The Current Status of Spinal Posttraumatic Deformity: A Systematic Review

Author:

De Gendt Erin E. A.1ORCID,Vercoulen Timon F. G.1,Joaquim Andrei F.2ORCID,Guo Wei3,Vialle Emiliano N.4ORCID,Schroeder Gregory D.5,Schnake Klaus S.6,Vaccaro Alexander R.5ORCID,Benneker Lorin Michael7,Muijs Sander P. J.1,Oner F. Cumhur1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands

2. Department of Neurosurgery, State University of Campinas, Campinas, Cidade Universitária Zeferino Vaz—Barão Geraldo, Campinas—SP, Brazil

3. Department of Orthopedics, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Haizhu District, Guangdong Province, China

4. Department of Orthopaedics, Cajuru Hospital, Catholic University of Paraná, Curitiba, Av. São José, Brazil

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, PA, USA

6. Center for Spinal Surgery, Schön Klinik Nürnberg Fürth, Germany

7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland.

Abstract

Study Design: Systematic Review. Objective: To systematically analyze the definitions and descriptions in literature of “Spinal Posttraumatic Deformity” (SPTD) in order to support the development of a uniform and comprehensive definition of clinically relevant SPTD. Methods: A literature search in 11 international databases was performed using “deformity” AND “posttraumatic” and its synonyms. When an original definition or a description of SPTD (Patient factors, Radiological outcomes, Patient Reported Outcome Measurements and Surgical indication) was present the article was included. The retrieved articles were assessed for methodological quality and the presented data was extracted. Results: 46 articles met the inclusion criteria. “Symptomatic SPTD” was mentioned multiple times as an entity, however any description of “symptomatic SPTD” was not found. Pain was mentioned as a key factor in SPTD. Other patient related parameters were (progression of) neurological deficit, bone quality, age, comorbidities and functional disability. Various ways were used to determine the amount of deformity on radiographs. The amount of deformity ranged from not deviant for normal to >30°. Sagittal balance and spinopelvic parameters such as the Pelvic Incidence, Pelvic Tilt and Sacral Slope were taken into account and were used as surgical indicators and preoperative planning. The Visual Analog Scale for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index were used mostly to evaluate surgical intervention. Conclusion: A clear-cut definition or consensus is not available in the literature about clinically relevant SPTD. Our research acts as the basis for international efforts for the development of a definition of SPTD.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3