Modern Internet Search Analytics: Is There a Difference in What Patients are Searching Regarding the Operative and Nonoperative Management of Scoliosis?

Author:

Mastrokostas Paul G.1ORCID,Mastrokostas Leonidas E.2ORCID,Emara Ahmed K.3,Wellington Ian J.4ORCID,Ginalis Elizabeth5,Houten John K.6,Khalsa Amrit S.7,Saleh Ahmed8,Razi Afshin E.8,Ng Mitchell K.8ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Medicine, State University of New York (SUNY) Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA

2. Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA

3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT, USA

5. Department of Neurosurgery, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

7. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

8. Maimonides Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brooklyn, NY, USA

Abstract

Study Design Observational Study. Objectives This study aimed to investigate the most searched types of questions and online resources implicated in the operative and nonoperative management of scoliosis. Methods Six terms related to operative and nonoperative scoliosis treatment were searched on Google’s People Also Ask section on October 12, 2023. The Rothwell classification was used to sort questions into fact, policy, or value categories, and associated websites were classified by type. Fischer’s exact tests compared question type and websites encountered between operative and nonoperative questions. Statistical significance was set at the .05 level. Results The most common questions concerning operative and nonoperative management were fact (53.4%) and value (35.5%) questions, respectively. The most common subcategory pertaining to operative and nonoperative questions were specific activities/restrictions (21.7%) and evaluation of treatment (33.3%), respectively. Questions on indications/management (13.2% vs 31.2%, P < .001) and evaluation of treatment (10.1% vs 33.3%, P < .001) were associated with nonoperative scoliosis management. Medical practice websites were the most common website to which questions concerning operative (31.9%) and nonoperative (51.4%) management were directed to. Operative questions were more likely to be directed to academic websites (21.7% vs 10.0%, P = .037) and less likely to be directed to medical practice websites (31.9% vs 51.4%, P = .007) than nonoperative questions. Conclusions During scoliosis consultations, spine surgeons should emphasize the postoperative recovery process and efficacy of conservative treatment modalities for the operative and nonoperative management of scoliosis, respectively. Future research should assess the impact of website encounters on patients’ decision-making.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3