Patterns of Lumbar Spine Malalignment Leading to Revision Surgery for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Cluster Analysis of Over- Versus Under-Correction

Author:

Lafage Renaud1ORCID,Passias Peter2,Sheikh Alshabab Basel1,Bess Shay3,Smith Justin S.4ORCID,Klineberg Eric5,Kim Han Jo1ORCID,Elysee Jonathan1,Shaffrey Christopher6,Burton Douglas7,Hostin Richard8,Mundis Gregory9,Schwab Frank1,Lafage Virginie1,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA

2. Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY, USA

3. Denver International Spine Center, Presbyterian St Luke’s/Rocky Mountain Hospital for Children, Denver, CO, USA

4. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA

6. Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA

7. Department of Orthopaedics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA

8. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor Scoliosis Center, Dallas, TX, USA

9. Department Of Orthopedics, Scripps Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA

Abstract

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective Investigate the patterns of fused lumbar alignment in patients requiring revision surgery for proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK). Methods Fifty patients (67.8 yo, 76% female) with existing thoraco-lumbar fusion (T10/12 to pelvis) and indicated for surgical correction for PJK were included. To investigate patterns of radiographic alignment prior to PJK revision, unsupervised 2-step cluster analysis was run on parameters describing the fused lumbar spine (PI-LL) to identify natural independent groups within the cohort. Clusters were compared in terms of demographics, pre-operative alignment, surgical parameters, and post-operative alignment. Associations between pre- and post-revision PJK angles were investigated using a Pearson correlation analysis. Results Analysis identified 2 distinct patterns: Under-corrected (UC, n = 12, 32%) vs over-corrected (OC, n = 34, 68%) with a silhouette of .5. The comparison demonstrated similar pelvic incidence (PI) and PJK angle but significantly greater deformity for the UC vs OC group in terms of PI-LL, PI-LL offset, pelvic tilt, and sagittal vertebral axis. The surgical strategy for PJK correction did not differ between the 2 groups in terms of approach, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade, decompression, use of osteotomy, interbody fusion, or fusion length. The post-revision PJK angle significantly correlated with the amount of PJK correction within the OC group but not within the UC group. Conclusions This study identified 2 patterns of lumbar malalignment associated with severe PJK: over vs under corrected. Despite the difference in PJK etiology, both patterns underwent the same revision strategy. Future analysis should look at the effect of correcting focal deformity alone vs correcting focal deformity and underlying malalignment simultaneously on recurrent PJK rate.

Funder

International Spine Study Group

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,Surgery

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3