Affiliation:
1. University of Arkansas at Pine Bluff, Pine Bluff, AR, USA
Abstract
This article examines the presentation of caste systems of stratification in U.S. introductory sociology textbooks. First, the “caste versus class” debate from the 1930s and 1940s is summarized and its competing perspectives are evaluated. Second, after an in-depth analysis of introductory sociology textbooks presenting material on the subject, evidence is presented that (1) the majority of texts present a discussion on social stratification in the United States that is often misleading and inaccurate and (2) none of the textbooks go as far as to present the current system of stratification in U.S. society as caste. In fact, evidence suggests a kind of systematic reluctance exists among the authors to associate caste with U.S. society. The benefits of changing the way we as sociologists think about and teach social stratification, as well as the consequences for continuing the status quo, are addressed.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Education
Reference86 articles.
1. Titles marked with an asterisk indicate textbooks used by Oyinlade, Christo, and Finch (2020), which had originated in Liu and Szasz (2019).
2. Titles marked with a plus symbol indicate textbooks included among the bestsellers of sociology textbooks listed at Amazon.com.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献