Affiliation:
1. The University of Memphis, USA
2. University of Notre Dame, USA
Abstract
Eisenstadt’s most well-known contributions come primarily from his research on “multiple modernities.” Less appreciated has been his evolutionary theory of cultural change. In this article, we revisit Eisenstadt’s evolutionary theory in order to make explicit his potential contributions to the neo-evolutionary tradition and demonstrate where his contribution can be further appreciated. In short, Eisenstadt’s theory supplements macro-level materialist and micro-level bio-psychological theories by (1) offering a group-level theory that takes agency and historicity seriously by calling attention to the role of institutional entrepreneurs and their projects for cultural change; (2) formulating a multi-linear, multi-directional theory of evolution that avoids determinist traps; (3) highlighting non-materialist crises such as the widespread breakdown in trust, the discontents of centralized and consolidated power, and the collapse of a shared sense of meaning; and (4) accounting for the possible conditions of success or failure. Historical examples are used to illustrate Eisenstadt’s model.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Attention, shocks, and relevance judgements: the case of white nationalism in the U.S. South, 1980–2008;Social Movement Studies;2024-06-27
2. Inhalt;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26
3. Frontmatter;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26
4. Über die Autor:innen;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26
5. Literatur;Global Studies & Theory of Society;2024-04-26