Affiliation:
1. School of Communication, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
2. Department of Political Science, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Abstract
The events surrounding the 2020 U.S. election and the January 6 insurrection have challenged scholarly understanding of concepts like collective action, radicalization, and mobilization. In this article, we argue that online far-right radicalization is better understood as a form of distributed cognition, in which the groups’ online environment incentivizes certain patterns of behavior over others. Namely, these platforms organize their users in ways that facilitate a nefarious form of collective intelligence, which is amplified and strengthened by systems of algorithmic curation. In short, these platforms reflect and facilitate undemocratic cognition, fueled by affective networks, contributing to events like the January 6 insurrection and far-right extremism more broadly. To demonstrate, we apply this framing to a case study (the “Stop the Steal” movement) to illustrate how this framework can make sense of radicalization and mobilization influenced by undemocratic cognition.
Subject
General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology
Reference85 articles.
1. The Cultural Politics of Emotion
2. Technological Seduction and Self-Radicalization
3. Talking to Strangers
4. Amarasingam A., Argentino M.A. (2020). The QAnon conspiracy theory: A security threat in the making?” CTCSentinal13(7): 37–44. https://www.ctc.usma.edu/the-qanon-conspiracy-theory-a-security-threat-in-the-making/ (Retrieved 16 February 2021).
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献