In the Mode. . .Text-to-Web Survey Data Collection: An Exploratory Study in Preelection Polling of the U.S. Presidential Election

Author:

Kimball Spencer1,Holloway Isabel1

Affiliation:

1. Emerson College, Boston, MA, USA

Abstract

As our society rapidly employs new forms of communication, new modes of data collection are challenging the best practices developed over years of polling. Preelection polling must simultaneously evolve, as new modes have emerged in the past few decades, including computer-mediated communication, mobile texting, and the use of touch tone keypads to communicate information. A tension exists between traditional and novel means of interpersonal communication, and researchers are struggling to determine which traditional methods of data collection still have a place in the modern industry. This study examined three relatively new modes of preelection poll data collection, online, mobile, and IVR (interactive voice recognition) to determine what relationships exist, if any, between the mode of data collection and the composition of a sample across eight demographic variables: age, education, gender, political affiliation, race, region, 2016 Vote History, and 2020 Vote Intention. Twenty-six preelection polls were used in the study, with each poll ranging in collection dates between August 30 and October 31, 2020. The total combined sample size for this study is n = 19,886; 49% were IVR respondents ( n = 9,795), 25% was collected from online panels ( n = 5,039), and 25% was collected from short message service (SMS)-to-web respondents ( n = 5,052). A χ2 (chi-square) test for association was conducted using a significance level of p < .05 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) and found a significant difference between each mode of data collection across the eight aforementioned variables. A significant difference between political party affiliation/registration and mode of data collection was attributed to the educational attainment of individuals participating in each preelection polls based on the mode of data collection. This study suggests that underlying variables within the sample composition of different modes of data collection can have an impact on the accuracy of preelection polls.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Social Sciences,Sociology and Political Science,Education,Cultural Studies,Social Psychology

Reference15 articles.

1. Aristotle International. (2021), Aristotle VoterListsOnline (VLO). Retrieved July 29, 2021, from https://www.aristotle.com/

2. Cassino D. (2016, August 1). How today’s political polling works. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2016/08/how-todays-political-polling-works

3. Collins K. (2019, May 16–19). Evaluating text message surveys for pre-election polling [Conference Presentation]. AAPOR 2019 Convention, Toronto, Canada. https://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/MainSiteFiles/AAPOR-19-Web-Version-Update-5-8-19.pdf

4. Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau Seeks Comment on Interpretation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act in Light of the D.C. Circuit’s ACA International Decision (2018, June 6). Federal Register.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3