A Comparative Evaluation of Bedside Capillary Blood Glucose Monitoring Devices Designed for Hospital Use

Author:

Johnson Patricia L.,Luther Robyn J.,Hipp Shelia,Stegeman Michael,Green Andrew J.1

Affiliation:

1. 10550 Quivira, Suite 290, Overland Park, Kansas 66215

Abstract

Capillary blood glucose monitoring devices (CBGMs) that incorporate "wipeless" technology recently have been designed and marketed for hospital use. Our objective was to evaluate three such devices for accuracy and precision, comparing them to a popular device that utilizes older technology and to a reference standard. Blood glucose level was simultaneously determined on the CBGMs and a reference standard. Results were analyzed for precision by performing repeated measurements of a single sample and for accuracy across the entire range of determinations. Clinically relevant subsets of the entire range also were detemnined and arbitrarily defined as low (<60 mg/dL), normal (60 to 140 mg/dL), high (141 to 300 mg/dL), and very high (>300 mg/dL). We found that accuracy and precision of these devices varied considerably. Lack of accuracy was particularly evident upon analysis of the clinically relevant subset ranges of blood glucose levels. Consequently, routine evaluation of CBGMs should include analysis of clinically relevant subset ranges of blood glucose levels. The marked differences in accuracy and precision between CBGMs that are currently

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous),Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Accuracy of Portable Blood Glucose Monitors;Journal of the American Pharmacists Association;2005-07

2. The Validity of the Medisafe Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose System;Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics;2002-10

3. Recent developments in diabetes: equipment and technology;British Journal of Community Nursing;1998-07

4. Determining Acceptability of Blood Glucose Meters: Design of Meter Evaluations;Laboratory Medicine;1996-08-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3