An Integrative Review of the Quality and Outcomes of Diabetes Education Programs for Children and Adolescents

Author:

Colson Sébastien12345,Côté José12345,Gentile Stéphanie12345,Hamel Valérie12345,Sapuppo Cédric12345,Ramirez-Garcia Pilar12345,Reynaud Rachel12345,Lagouanelle-Simeoni Marie-Claude12345

Affiliation:

1. Aix Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine, EA3279-SPMC, Marseille, France (Mr Colson, Prof Gentile)

2. Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille (APHM)–Coordination Générale des Soins, Marseille, France (Mr Colson)

3. Université de Montréal–Faculté de Sciences Infirmières, Research Chair in Innovative Nursing Practices, Montréal, Canada (Mr Colson, Prof Côté, Ms Ramirez-Garcia)

4. Research Centre of the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Research Chair in Innovative Nursing Practices, Montréal, Canada (Prof Côté)

5. APHM, Service d’Evaluation Médicale, Marseille, France (Prof Gentile, Dr Lagouanelle-Simeoni)

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was twofold: (1) to describe the content of recent diabetes education programs and their outcomes in terms of glycemic control, disease management, and psychosocial criteria for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes and (2) to gauge the match between these programs and the recommendations of the International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD). Methods The integrative review was carried out according to the Cochrane recommendations. Thirteen databases were searched for evaluations of education programs published from 2009 to 2014. Program characteristics and outcomes were described. Quality of studies was assessed, and program match with ISPAD recommendations was gauged. Results Of 2528 studies found, 43 covering 36 education programs intended for youth with type 1 diabetes were retained for review. Nine of these centered on self-care competencies, 18 on psychosocial competencies, and 9 on both types of competency (mixed program). Programs varied widely in terms of organization, procedure, and content. Glycemic control was an indicator assessed in the majority of programs, but only half of these (for the most part, self-care programs) reported positive findings in this regard. Few programs seemed to affect psychosocial indicators. An online mixed program, which was the program that best met the ISPAD recommendations, proved to have an influence on glycemic control and several psychosocial criteria. Conclusions Various avenues can be considered to improve participant engagement in education programs and to align these programs more closely with international recommendations. Further research is required to enhance knowledge in this field.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Professions (miscellaneous),Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3