A Head-to-Head Comparison of the Postprandial Effects of 3 Meal Replacement Beverages Among People With Type 2 Diabetes

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 3 meal replacement beverages on glycemic response among people with type 2 diabetes. Methods The study examined Glucerna® Weight Loss Shake, Slim-Fast® Shake, and Ensure® with Fiber Shake, using a prospective, 3-way, cross-over design. Eighteen subjects with type 2 diabetes drank the beverages in random order on different weeks. The volume of each beverage was adjusted to include 50 grams of carbohydrates. Glucose was measured 0 to 180 minutes postprandial. Analyses included 2-factor analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures on both factors, calculation of area under the curve (AUC), and 1-way repeated measures ANOVA of AUC. Results The postprandial glucose profiles of the shakes differed. Glucerna® had the best profile as indicated by the graph of mean postprandial glucose levels and its lower incremental AUC. Despite the superiority of Glucerna®, 2-hour postprandial blood glucose values exceeded the ADA’s recommended upper limit for 22% of the subjects. Conclusions Meal replacement beverages are a popular and potentially effective option for people trying to lose or maintain weight; however, it is unknown to what degrees they affect postprandial blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes. Because postprandial glycemic excursion is linked to cardiovascular disease, identifying a meal replacement beverage with the lowest glycemic response may mitigate some of the risks in patients with diabetes. Of the meal replacements observed in this study, Glucerna® had the smallest effect on postprandial glucose. Glycemic response to meal replacements should be monitored given product and individual variability.