How Patients' Preferences for Risk Information Influence Treatment Choice in a Case of High Risk and High Therapeutic Uncertainty

Author:

Mazur Dennis J.,Hickam David H.,Mazur Marcus D.

Abstract

To assess how patients' preferences for non-numerical risk information are related to their tendency to choose early surgical treatment for asymptomatic gland-confined prostate cancer (a choice with high risk and high therapeutic uncertainty), the authors conducted a cross-sectional study of 228 patients receiving continuing care in a gen eral medicine clinic. After being provided with three data disclosures related to the treatment decision, subjects were given a choice between surgery-now and watchful waiting. Data about surgical complications were presented in numerical format. The subjects were also asked whether they preferred communication with their physician about the chance (probability) of adverse outcomes—related to management strate gies—in terms of words (such as possible or probable) or numbers (such as percent ages). Of the 226 patients who chose either surgery-now or watchful waiting, 71.2% preferred risk information in terms of words only or numbers only: 44% words only, and 56% numbers only. Younger patients (OR = 1.06 per year; Cl = 1.02-1.10, p = 0.0008) and those wanting risk communication in terms of words only (OR = 2.41; Cl = 1.24-4.70, p = 0.01) tended to prefer surgery-now over watchful waiting as the management strategy for asymptomatic gland-confined prostate carcinoma. The au thors conclude that there is a significant association between patients' preferences for risk communication with their physicians in terms of words only and a tendency to prefer early surgical intervention for prostate cancer when surgical risk data are pro vided numerically. Key words: informed consent; medical decision making; patient- physician communication; patient preference; prostate carcinoma; nsk. (Med Decis Making 1999;19:394-398)

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3