Abdominal versus Vaginal Hysterectomy

Author:

Kovac S. Robert,Christie Sandra J.,Bindbeutel Gary A.

Abstract

To identify the effects of preoperative assessment and physician practice style on the out comes of hysterectomy, the authors conducted a small-area analysis of 640 women under going abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy in a St. Louis, Missouri, hospital. Of these patients, excluding outliers, 115 met the conditions for inclusion in the study. Hysterectomies were performed by the abdominal route in 55 (47.8%) and by the vaginal route in 60 (52.2%) of the 115 patients. A total of 29 physicians performed the hysterectomies. Of these 29, 15 (51.7%) were predisposed toward the abdominal approach, 13 (44.8%) had no appreciable predisposition, and one (3.5%) was predisposed toward the vaginal procedure. Path analysis revealed that physician decision making about the type of hysterectomy procedure performed was primarily influenced by practice style (predisposition) and variables related to physician preoperative assessments (uterine size and uterine mobility), some of which are prone to inaccuracy. Factors that traditionally determine operative approach (such as obesity) did not always act in the expected direction. Furthermore, the decision to perform hysterectomy vaginally had positive outcomes for both cost and length of hospital stay. Shorter hospital stays were associated with physician factors that included selection of the vaginal route, training site, predisposition toward the vaginal procedure, and preoperative assessment of uterine size. Length of hospital stay and duration of surgery were the strongest predictors of cost. Other factors being equal, the mean cost of a vaginal procedure is $224 less than that of an abdominal hysterectomy. Establishing the vaginal approach as the recommended procedure for this specific population should result in cost reductions and shorter hospital stays without negatively impacting quality of care. Key words: hysterectomy; hysterectomy, vaginal; decision making; economics, medical; evaluation studies. (Med Decis Making 1991;11:19-28)

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference18 articles.

1. Complications of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy among women of reproductive age in the United States

2. Mattingly RF, Thompson JF Leiomyomata uteri and abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease. In: Te Linde RW, ed. Te Linde's operative gynecology. 6th ed. Philadelphia : J. B. Lippincott, 1985:203-55.

Cited by 51 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Hysterectomy in Women Without Previous Vaginal Delivery;Hysterectomy;2017-09-15

2. Hysterectomy Techniques for the Large Uterus;Hysterectomy;2017-09-15

3. Deciding the Route for Hysterectomy: Indian Triage System;The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India;2014-06-11

4. Route of Hysterectomy;Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology;2014-03

5. Hysterektomie – vaginal, abdominal oder laparoskopisch assistiert?;Der Gynäkologe;2008-04-25

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3