Decision Regret following Treatment for Localized Breast Cancer

Author:

Martinez Kathryn A.12345,Li Yun12345,Resnicow Ken12345,Graff John J.12345,Hamilton Ann S.12345,Hawley Sarah T.12345

Affiliation:

1. VA Ann Arbor Center for Clinical Management Research, Ann Arbor, Michigan (KAM, STH)

2. University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Ann Arbor, Michigan (YL)

3. University of Michigan School of Public Health, Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, Ann Arbor, Michigan (KR)

4. Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey (JJG)

5. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California (ASH)

Abstract

Background. While studies suggest most women have little regret regarding their breast cancer treatment decisions immediately following treatment, no studies to date have evaluated how regret may change over time. Objective. To measure the stability of posttreatment decision regret over time among women with breast cancer. Methods. Women diagnosed with breast cancer between August 2005 and May 2007 reported to the Detroit, Michigan, or Los Angeles County Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry and completed surveys at 9 months following diagnosis (time 1) and again approximately 4 years later (time 2). A decision regret scale consisting of 5 items was summed to create 2 decision regret scores at both time 1 and time 2 (range, 0–20). Multivariable linear regression was used to examine change in regret from 9 months to 4 years. Independent variables included surgery type, receipt of reconstruction, and recurrence status at follow-up. The model controlled for demographic and clinical factors. Results. The analytic sample included 1536 women. Mean regret in the overall sample was 4.9 at time 1 and 5.4 at time 2 ( P < 0.001). In the multivariable linear model, we found no difference in change in decision regret over time by surgery type. Reporting a new diagnosis of breast cancer at time 2 was associated with a 2.6-point increase in regret over time compared with women without an additional diagnosis ( P = 0.003). Receipt of reconstruction was not associated with change in decision regret over time. Conclusions. Decision regret following treatment was low and relatively stable over time for most women. Those facing an additional diagnosis of breast cancer following treatment may be at risk for elevated regret-related distress.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3