Decision-making Strategies for Telephone Triage in Emergency Medical Services

Author:

Leprohon Judith,Patel Vimla L.

Abstract

Decision-making strategies used by nurses in telephone triage involving public emergency calls for medical help were investigated as a function of task urgency and complexity in the real-world dynamic environment. The sample included 34 nurses as call receivers. Tran scripts of 50 nurse-client dialogues and 50 explanations of the decision-making process, elicited immediately after completion of the calls, were analyzed using methods of discourse and protocol analyses. In high-urgency situations, heuristic rules based on symptoms were used, and the decisions were mostly accurate. With the increase in problem complexity, more causal explanations were found, and the decisions were more often inaccurate. Fur thermore, the explanations supporting the accurate decisions were often inaccurate, showing a decoupling of knowledge and action. Alternate strategies were used in moderate- to low- urgency conditions, where contextual knowledge of the situations was exploited to identify the needs of the clients and to negotiate the best plan of action to meet these needs, resulting in more accurate decisions. Key words: clinical reasoning; cognitive models; context; decision making strategies; emergency medical services; intuition; nursing decision making; telephone triage; uncertainty. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:240-253)

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Reference42 articles.

1. Bouchier G. Organisation et gestion: origine des déplacements injustifés du SMUR . Revue des SAMU, Centre de documentation d'Urgences Santé , Montréal, Quebec, Canada. 1986 ;4:180-4.

2. Leprohon J., Farand L., Patel VL Evaluation of clinical decision making in telephone triage. In: Bender W, Hiemstra RJ, Scherpbier AJJA, Zwierstra RP, eds. Teaching and Assessing Clinical Competence. Groningen, The Netherlands: BoekWerk Publications, 1990, pp 441-5.

Cited by 112 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3