Reproductive Services and Conscience-Based Refusals in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training

Author:

Kalinowski Kristin1,Buskmiller Cara2ORCID,Ward Donald G.3

Affiliation:

1. PGY-2 Resident, Mercy Graduate Medical Education - OB/GYN Residency, St. Louis, MO, USA

2. PGY-6 Fellow, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA

3. Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women’s Health at Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA

Abstract

Purpose: Professional bodies such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recognize the impact of conscience-based decisions. The first time such decisions affect patients and providers is in residency. Our study sought to determine the attitudes of program directors towards various conscience-based refusals in potential applicants to obstetrics and gynecology programs. Method: An eight-question survey was sent to 279 directors of U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residencies in 2019. The survey proposed hypothetical conscientious refusals of common aspects of obstetric and gynecology practice. The survey asked respondents to categorize their reaction to these choices and choose from a list of factors which could modify their reaction. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed. Results: 97 program directors (35%) responded. A majority of PDs reported that the inability to prescribe or counsel on birth control, to provide methotrexate, to counsel on abortion, or to clearly enumerate refusals was impossible to work around, likely to lower an applicant’s rank, not compatible with training, or not good for patients; collectively, these responses were grouped as “negative reactions” (73–99%). Female program directors had more negative reactions to applicants who refused to prescribe birth control (aOR 15.8, 95% CI 1.7–99.5) and counsel on abortion (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2–10.8). Directors from different locations and program types did not have significantly different responses. A few program directors identified that academic strength could mitigate otherwise negatively-viewed choices. Illustrative comments of directors’ attitudes are provided. Conclusions: Program directors agree that conscientious refusal to participate in certain activities is problematic for obstetrics and gynecology residency. There are very few subjective or regional differences on this stance, and few aspects of an application modify directors’ reactions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Philosophy

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Ectopic Pregnancy as Previable Delivery;Christian bioethics: Non-Ecumenical Studies in Medical Morality;2024-04-26

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3