Physician and Staff Perceptions of Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening in Appalachian Kentucky

Author:

Kelly Kimberly M.1,Phillips Clarenda M.2,Jenkins Crystal3,Norling Gretchen4,White Carol5,Jenkins Todd6,Armstrong Debra7,Petrik Joe8,Steinkuhl Amy7,Washington Regina5,Dignan Mark5

Affiliation:

1. Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio

2. Department of Sociology, Social Work, and Criminology at Morehead State University, Kentucky

3. South Central Center for Public Health Preparedness, University of Alabama-Birmingham

4. University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida

5. Prevention Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky

6. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama-Birmingham

7. University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky

8. College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky

Abstract

Background Data indicate that in 1997 to 1999, only 44% of Appalachian Kentuckians underwent colorectal cancer screening consistent with guidelines. We investigated the reasons for, barriers to, and follow-up of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening recommendations in primary care practices seeing patients from Appalachian Kentucky. Methods A mixed-methods [qualitative (focus group) and quantitative (survey)] approach was used to gather and analyze data in five primary care practices. A total of 34 participated in the focus groups. Results In focus groups, physicians and office staff reported a number of indicators for CRC screening; physician, patient, and procedural barriers to CRC screening; and strategies to overcome these barriers to screening. Most physicians used personal experience to guide screening, but it was unclear what was meant by personal experience. Commonly cited patient barriers to screening were fear and embarrassment. Physicians reported several approaches to overcome these barriers, including establishing trust and educating patients. Survey data identified a number of resources to assist practices in promoting screening, most commonly, patient educational materials. Finally, fecal occult blood test was most commonly recommended because it is inexpensive and easy to administer. Conclusions Our mixed methods approach not only helped to understand the physicians’ perceptions of the problems and barriers to CRC screening in Appalachian Kentucky, but also elucidated how practices endeavor to overcome these barriers and identified the additional resources practices would like in order to promote CRC screening.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology,Hematology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3