An International Consensus on Actions to Improve Lung Cancer Survival: A Modified Delphi Method Among Clinical Experts in the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership

Author:

Lynch Charlotte1ORCID,Harrison Samantha1,Butler John12,Baldwin David R.3,Dawkins Paul4,van der Horst Joris5,Jakobsen Erik6,McAleese Jonathan7,McWilliams Annette8,Redmond Karen9,Swaminath Anand10,Finley Christian J.11

Affiliation:

1. International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) and Strategic Evidence, Policy, Information & Communications, Cancer Research UK, London, UK

2. Gynaecology Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

3. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK

4. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Middlemore Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand

5. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK

6. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

7. Department of Clinical Oncology, Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, Northern Ireland, UK

8. Department of Respiratory Medicine, Fiona Stanley Hospital and University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia

9. Department of Thoracic Surgery and Transplantation, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital and School of Medicine, Dublin, Ireland

10. Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

11. Division of Thoracic Surgery, St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada

Abstract

Background Research from the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP) demonstrates that international variation in lung cancer survival persists, particularly within early stage disease. There is a lack of international consensus on the critical contributing components to variation in lung cancer outcomes and the steps needed to optimise lung cancer services. These are needed to improve the quality of options for and equitable access to treatment, and ultimately improve survival. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 9 key informants from ICBP countries. An international clinical network representing 6 ICBP countries (Australia, Canada, Denmark, England, Ireland, New Zealand, Northern Ireland, Scotland & Wales) was established to share local clinical insights and examples of best practice. Using a modified Delphi consensus model, network members suggested and rated recommendations to optimise the management of lung cancer. Calls to Action were developed via Delphi voting as the most crucial recommendations, with Good Practice Points included to support their implementation. Results Five Calls to Action and thirteen Good Practice Points applicable to high income, comparable countries were developed and achieved 100% consensus. Calls to Action include (1) Implement cost-effective, clinically efficacious, and equitable lung cancer screening initiatives; (2) Ensure diagnosis of lung cancer within 30 days of referral; (3) Develop Thoracic Centres of Excellence; (4) Undertake an international audit of lung cancer care; and (5) Recognise improvements in lung cancer care and outcomes as a priority in cancer policy. Conclusion The recommendations presented are the voice of an expert international lung cancer clinical network, and signpost key considerations for policymakers in countries within the ICBP but also in other comparable high-income countries. These define a roadmap to help align and focus efforts in improving outcomes and management of lung cancer patients globally.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Oncology,Hematology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3