Affiliation:
1. Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, PC, Washington, DC, USA
Abstract
When does a single positive adequate and well-controlled study of a new drug meet the statutory requirement to demonstrate substantial evidence of effectiveness? The answer to this question, particularly with respect to new molecular entities, has been of considerable debate since 1962 when the requirement that new drugs prove their benefit to patients became law. A 1997 revision to the statute provided one pathway to a single-study approval (a single adequate and well-controlled study plus confirmatory evidence), while a 1998 guidance issued by FDA provided additional pathways, one of which is the one that is most frequently cited by FDA (a single statistically very persuasive study). This paper explains these 2 distinct pathways and provides illustrative examples of how FDA uses each of these 2 pathways. Regulators, industry, patients, and investors should each find this exegesis of these 2 independent, yet equally viable and valuable, pathways to an FDA approval both illuminating and invaluable.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Pharmacology (medical),Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (miscellaneous)
Reference7 articles.
1. Giapreza (angiotensin II), Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review Addendum, NDA 209360 (December 21, 2017).
2. Giapreza (angiotensin II), Office of Drug Evaluation 1: Decisional Memorandum, NDA 209360 (December 21, 2017).
3. Bevyxxa (betrixaban), Summary Review for Regulatory Action, NDA 208383 (June 23, 2017).
4. When academic research organizations and clinical research organizations disagree: Processes to minimize discrepancies prior to unblinding of randomized trials
5. Spinraza (nusinersen), Office of Drug Evalution-1: Decisional Memorandum, NDA 209531 (December 23, 2016).
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献