Comparison of Analgesia Treatment Methods After Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: A Network Meta-analysis of 42 Randomized Controlled Trials

Author:

Su Peng1,Liu Yijia2,Zhang Lu3,Bai Long-bin1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hand and Foot Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China.

2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

3. School of Finance, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan, China.

Abstract

Background: The optimal method for postoperative analgesia after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is still unclear. Purpose: To compare the efficacy of postoperative analgesic methods after ARCR through network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, we searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception until April 12, 2022, for randomized controlled trials and prospective controlled trials evaluating neuraxial analgesia, peripheral nerve block, periarticular local anesthetic infiltration, intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, oral analgesia, or any combination of these methods for pain management after ARCR. Outcomes included pain scores at rest, morphine consumption, and complications (nausea and vomiting). Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Network meta-analysis was used to assess the relative efficacy of the methods for postoperative analgesia. The best choice for postoperative analgesia was defined as the one with significant differences in pain scores and morphine consumption compared with placebo, with no significant difference in complications, during the initial 48 hours postoperatively. Results: Included were 42 studies with 3110 patients. Only suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) was significantly superior to placebo in pain scores (mean difference [MD], –0.93 [95% CI, –1.31 to –0.54] at 6 hours; MD, –2.34 [95% CI, –3.49 to –1.19] at 12 hours) and morphine consumption (MD, –17.70 [95% CI, –32.98 to –2.42] at 24 hours) ( P < .05 for all), with no difference in complications (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.21 to 4.32]; P > .05). Pain scores were significantly lower with interscalene nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, –0.69 [95% CI, –1.17 to –0.20] at 6 hours; MD, –1.44 [95% CI, –2.21 to –0.67] at 12 hours) and with SSNB + axillary nerve block compared with SSNB (MD, –3.09 [95% CI, –4.18 to –1.99] at 6 hours; MD, –0.87 [95% CI, –1.71 to –0.03] at 12 hours) ( P < .05 for all). Conclusion: Based on the current evidence, most analgesic methods lowered pain and morphine consumption compared with placebo. There were significant differences in pain scores between interscalene nerve block and SSNB during the first 12 hours postoperatively, and adding axillary nerve block to SSNB enhanced the analgesic effect.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3