Primary Repair for Injury of Medial Collateral Ligament During Total Knee Arthroplasty

Author:

Jin Cheng1,Zhao Jia-yi1,Seon Jong-Keun2,Santoso Asep3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Zhoushan Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhoushan, China

2. Center for Joint Disease, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Korea

3. Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Soeharso Orthopaedic Hospital, Sebelas Maret University, Solo, Indonesia

Abstract

This study, we aim to determine whether intraoperative over-release of MCL that is treated with primary repair can achieve satisfactory clinical results when compared to those who did not have over-release of MCL. At the same time, we seek to look into the difference between two methods of primary repair (anchor suture and staple) in terms of clinical outcomes. Purposes: We determined whether, after TKA, patients with CIA versus patients with CACB demonstrated (1) decreased pain scores (2) greater ambulatory ability postoperatively (3) decreased daily opioid consumption and hospital length of stay Methods: 3897 TKAs were performed from year 2003-2014. Sixty-five patients with MCL injury due to over-release during TKA who were repaired with suture anchor or staple (suture anchor: 36 vs. staple: 29) were studied whereas matched group of 65 patients without MCL injury were selected and served as the control group. Subjective feeling of instability and functional score were assessed using Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario & McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Objective stability was evaluated through measurement of opening angles in extension and 30° of knee flexion on valgus stress radiographs. The clinical and stability results of repair between the suture anchor and staple were compared. Results: The KSS and WOMAC scores in patients with primary repair of MCL during TKA from 50.6±14.8 to 87.3±8.3 and 65.9±16.3 to 17.7±8.3, respectively. However, there were neither statistical nor clinical significant difference when comparing between the group with primary repair and the control group. Radiographic stability also showed no differences between repair and control groups in extension and 30° of flexion (p= .63 and p= .37). Regarding the subgroups, There were no significant differences between the suture anchor and staple in terms of the stability and clinical outcomes Conclusion: Primary repair either with suture anchor or with staple for injury of the MCL in varus gonarthrosis during TKA provides a good stability and clinical outcomes as those of result with no MCL injury.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3